/* common.css already hides this br at <=768px; extend that up through 1650px, leaving <=768 as is. */
@media (min-width:769px) and (max-width:1650px) {
    .fullSwiperWrap .fullSwiperTit br {
        display: none;
    }
}

/* .slideTit ("Reducción del 30% ↓") is 4rem at 1024-1399px and 2.5rem at <=768px, with no rule
   for 769-1023px (it was silently falling back to the unconditional 5.625rem desktop base — a
   pre-existing gap, not something introduced here). That gap's "correct" value should match its
   1024-1399 neighbor (4rem), so folding 769-1023 into the same 0.8x tier as 1024-1160 both lands
   on 3.2rem anyway — one merged rule instead of two mismatched ones. */
@media (min-width:769px) and (max-width:1160px) {
    .fullSwiperWrap .swiper.fullSwiper .swiper-slide .slideContent .slideTit {
        font-size: 3.2rem;
    }

    .fullSwiperWrap .swiper.fullSwiper .swiper-slide .slideContent .slideTit .countTxt {
        min-width: auto;
    }
}

@media (max-width:768px) {
    .fullSwiperWrap .swiper.fullSwiper .swiper-slide .slideContent .slideTit {
        font-size: 2rem;
    }

    .fullSwiperWrap .swiper.fullSwiper .swiper-slide .slideContent .slideTit .countTxt {
        min-width: auto;
    }
}

/* 0.8x of the 2rem set above. */
@media (max-width:420px) {
    .fullSwiperWrap .swiper.fullSwiper .swiper-slide .slideContent .slideTit {
        font-size: 1.6rem;
    }
}